Independent Minds are the Antidote to the Mainstream Narrative


The Grand Western Strategy of a Fractured and Divided Middle East

Middle East Map 2.0 Trinacria Photo

By Steven MacMillan/The Analyst Report: 26 June, 2014

The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL/ISIS) is a covert Western army designed to carve out a Sunni mini-state in a chaotic Middle East, which is to be fractured along artificial sectarian and ethnic lines.

Iraq has been plunged into a further state of chaos over the past fortnight, as ISIL mercenaries have launched attacks against the Iraqi Army in numerous towns in the northwest of the country. ISIL is a group of foreign mercenaries supported by the west which has committed whatalmost certainly amounts to war crimesin Iraq, according to the UN Human Rights Chief Navi Pillay. The Sunni dominated ISIL has long been used by Western powers in neighbouring Syria to destabilise and destroy the Bashar al-Assad regime in Damascus, which refuses to be absorbed into the Western economic-corporate empire.

Western imperial powers have used a policy of divide and conquer, coupled with chaos, to fracture regimes along sectarian and ethnic lines in order to destroy nation states that resist Anglo-American-European hegemony. Iraq is part of a wider strategy for the Middle East which is advocated by western geopolitical strategists Zbigniew Brzezinski and Bernard Lewis. Historian and author Webster Tarpley crystallises the Brzezinski-Lewis blueprint for a “New Middle East” during an interview in 2012:

“The US strategic goal in the Middle East is the destruction of all existing national states. There’s an outline for this that has been known for many years as the Bernard Lewis plan, [and] it’s been expressed again by people like Zbigniew Brzezinski; micro states, mini-states, rump-states, secessionism, chaos, war lords and NATO feels free to seize whatever assets they think are important.” (3:29 into the interview)

Bernard Lewis gave a glimpse into the strategy of Western powers in an article published in the 1992 issue of “Foreign Affairs” titled: Rethinking the Middle East, where he outlines the possibility of a future Middle East comprised of warring sects and tribes:

“Another possibility, which could even be precipitated by fundamentalism, is what has of late become fashionable to call “Lebanonization.” Most of the states of the Middle East—Egypt is an obvious exception—are of recent and artificial construction and are vulnerable to such a process. If the central power is sufficiently weakened, there is no real civil society to hold the polity together, no real sense of common national identity or overriding allegiance to the nation state. The state then disintegrates—as happened in Lebanon—into a chaos of squabbling, feuding, fighting sects, tribes, regions and parties. If things go badly and central governments falter and collapse, the same could happen, not only in the countries of the existing Middle East, but also in the newly independent Soviet republics, where the artificial frontiers drawn by the former imperial masters left each republic with a mosaic of minorities and claims of one sort or another on or by its neighbours.”

As Tony Cartalucci has reported for New Eastern Outlook, ISIL is a creation of the US and its Sunni Gulf Monarch allies in the region. It is designed to create a Sunni Islamic state within Iraq and increase sectarian tensions across the Middle East which will weaken the Shia powers of Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. World Net Daily has also received leaks from Jordanian officials which reveal that the US military trained the militants in secret bases inside Jordan in 2012, to then be deployed to fight against the regime in Syria. ISIL has been destabilising Iraq for years and in March the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki asserted that Saudi Arabia and Qatar were funding the ISIL to weaken the government in Bagdad. In the run up to the Iraqi elections in April, ISIL was fighting in the western Anbar region of Iraq which resulted in approximately 300 deaths in February.

The official narrative propagated from the mainstream media is that Iraq is experiencing a bloody civil war that has erupted out of deep sectarian divisions that have existed for decades. Yet it has been documented at length that the main group that has been perpetuating the violence within Iraq – namely ISIL – is controlled by the West and their regional allies. A recent article in the Guardian newspaper by Iraqi refugee and Sociology lecturer at London Metropolitan University, Sami Ramadani, describes the absence of sectarian violence in Iraq prior to the invasion in 2003. He describes how sectarian violence only became a problem after the invasion, and believes that the colonial strategy of divide and rule has been used in Iraq to fragment the country into 3 regions based along sectarian lines.

The agenda of Iraq being divided into 3 separate regions has been the policy of Western imperious powers for decades, with a map released in 2006 by retired general of the U.S. National War Academy Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters depicting Iraq split into 3 regions; a Sunni Iraq to the west, a Arab Shia State in the east and a Free Kurdistan in the north.

Middle east map 2.0

As well as a controlled Sunni group capturing much of western Iraq in recent weeks, the prescient 2006 strategy outlined in the map is further supported by the Kurdish fighters in Syria carving out an independent region in the northeast of Syria. In January the Syrian Kurds declared an autonomous region which could see the creation of a Free Kurdistan in the Middle East, especially if it is merged with Iraqi Kurdistan in Northern Iraq next door.

Imperious powers have always feared a strong, unified and cohesive people who can form organised resistance movements to oppose colonial forces. Classical divide and conquer doctrine has been implemented in the Middle East over the previous few decades in order to engineer a state of chaos which destroys nation states. Destabilisation, chaos and balkanisation is the policy of today, which weakens regimes who are hostile to Western geostrategic interests and allows multinational corporations to rape the region of its resources.

Photo: Shutterstock.com (c) Trinacria Photo

26 thoughts on “The Grand Western Strategy of a Fractured and Divided Middle East

  1. Anna

    On the deepest levels, this is exactly what the Ukraine conflict was about, balkanization of that nation state. Russia is complicit in the theatrics, and its political and economic power base has been in a state of deep capture by the apex globalists since at least Russia’s engineered economic collapse in the 90s. Putin called for IMF intervention in Ukraine and he has long been on record calling for regional governance as being essential “bricks” in the development of the new international economic order (NWO).

  2. Beverly Blakemore

    I think that ISIS has never had a more helpful advocate than Barack Obama, but that’s becuase he seems to be more the jihadi-in-chief of the US. There’s a long history of US geopolitical engineering in the ME. The western elites have been working on this since at least 1919 when they broke up the Ottoman Empire, the previous global caliphate. They have been attempting to pick winners and losers and set up artificial boundaries across the Mid East to separate a billion people with the same government, language, law, religion, heritage, history, and legacy, aka “Islam”.

    Just fyi, a British company struck crude oil in southwest Iran in 1908, so I’d be surprised if there wasn’t some inkling of the wealth that could be generated if other finds like that could be made throughout the Middle East.

  3. Beverly Blakemore

    They don’t intend for it to remain fractured or unstable… it’s just long enough precipitate mitigating action which will lead us all to the next stage of their long-range plans, begun when Woodrow Wilson was president of the USA. Whatever we fear is the outcome, whatever turns out to be the outcome, it was all planned and set in motion before or during World War I, in my opinion.


Leave a Reply to Beverly Blakemore Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *